Earlier today, my photo-stream finally reached the One Million "view" count. I do appreciate all of you who've spent time looking at my photos, both good and bad. :-) Thanks to my contacts who stop by when they can. I've spent a lot of time in several Disney groups, the Super Six Awards groups, as well as most of the Views: groups that I moderate. And a certain amount of these clicks have also been caused by search bots, and bloggers. Due to time constraints, I've had to limit my time in a few other awards groups that I used to post to. I've looked forward for the last few years to reaching 1M views on this small stream, for whatever that is worth in the grand scheme of things. :-)
I started this stream in February 2008, and reached 900,000 views in July of 2013. As time went by, my stream views increased to the point that it averaged about 600 views per day, or 18,000 to 20,000 per month. Not a lot in comparison to some of my contacts, but I've been happy with the activity received.
However, I think that the recent activity has been caused by the new AWESOME (sarcasm) way that Flickr now determines "views".
As you can see from the graph, I received 100,000 views in the last 6 weeks. Most of these have been received since July 29th, the day that Flicker enacted their last major change. (The zero count on the graph was actually about 2600 views. The graph dumped the count the next day, as it occasionally has done through the years.
So, I've gone from about 600 views per day to about 2500 to 3000 per day without doing anything different. I still post only one photo per day.
Does anyone else think that this 500% increase in "views" has anything to do with Yahoo and Flickr selling advertising at higher rates, due to increased page click counts on their new "Awesome" web site? :-)
Loading contexts...
